Showing posts with label Renaissance man. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Renaissance man. Show all posts

Thursday, May 5, 2016

Back From Hiatus

I disappeared for a while, around the time I was moving into a new apartment.  Now I am back, and I may be spotty for a while, as things are still getting sorted out, but I am back from my hiatus, and will be back writing posts on the state of our evolution here in America very soon.

Friday, March 4, 2016

Humanism: Physiological Needs

Humanist psychology, in line with humanist philosophy, chooses to examine people holistically, as a person who is more than the sum of their behaviors and experiences, and capable of great things, with an inward drive towards actualization.  It rejects previous deterministic models of human psychology by examining a person's subjective reality and perspective, and accounting for that person's free will.  It assumes a multitiered model of the prerequisites for humanity to be able to achieve that psychological imperative.  When the needs of each level have been met, the human may progress to the next stage of psychological achievement.  Each progressive stage cannot be reached, or at least not maintained, without a solid foundation of the lower order requirements.  If a person's basic needs are not being met, then they cannot fulfill their potential.  Today we will be talking about the most basic needs of humanity, the physiological.


A representation of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, By J. Finkelstein - I created this work using Inkscape., CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1315147

Physiological

As with any structure, if the base is weak, or incomplete, the structure will collapse.  Humanities most basic physiological needs form the foundation of the pyramid.  People cannot possibly live actualized lives, or have a sense of belonging and esteem if they do not have food to eat or a place to live.  It is essential for the functioning of an ethical society to provide for its people the basic physiological necessities of life.  Therefore, I view these as natural rights belonging to all people, not as granted by god, but by virtue of their humanity and the intrinsic.  Therefore the state is required to protect these human rights.
  • Breathing: Duh
  • Food and Water:  Everyone deserves food, without question.  As a natural right, I view this as one of the unalienable rights referred to in the Declaration of Independence.  Nothing takes away a person's right to food and water.   If a person cannot provide for their own feeding, then they must be fed.  I would oppose as a human rights violation any attempt to abridge the food stamp program that did not supplant it with a superior system.  This includes drug testing.  The use of, even addiction to, drugs cannot deprive a person of the right to eat.  Everyone deserves food, not matter the circumstances.
  • Sex: Simply put, all humans of sexual maturity experience sexuality, and must be required to express that sexuality unpunished.  This includes all expressions of sexuality between mature and consenting individuals; man and woman, man and man, woman and woman, masturbation, abstinence, and any other.  It must be stressed that the right to abstain from sex is as integral to physiological needs as the right to sex itself.  Abstinence in this case can mean from sex as a whole, or from any undesired act thereof at any given instance.  Consent to sex on one instance does not imply consent to sex on another instance.  Consent can be given and withdrawn at will. 
  • Sleep: Simple put, while no one can or should be legally required to sleep, most particularly not at any specified time, every human is entitled by right of humanity to sleep 8 hours a day should they desire it.  From a practical standpoint, this places an upper limit on the length of any legal work day. 
  • Homeostasis: Scientifically, this refers to a sort of biological equilibrium amounting to freedom from excess heat and cold, and other factors.  From a practical standpoint, this refers to two things: clothes and shelter.  All people are entitled to a home address, and clothes to wear.  Chronic homelessness is unacceptable.  An argument could also be made that the right to homeostasis includes healthcare as a means of achieving that homeostasis.  This is, in fact, the position of the World Health Organization.
  • Excretion: We all piss and shit.  Deal with it.  It's a right.  People who make you pay to use the toilet are jerks.

Implications

If we accept the premise that the aforementioned physiological needs of humanity are basic human rights, and the premise that it is the duty and purpose of government to defend human rights (such would be in keeping with the Enlightenment ideals in which the United States of America was formed), then it must naturally be concluded that the above needs of humanity must be met, and that it is the duty and purpose of government to ensure that they are met.  

I would also posit that if we are to hold to the ideals of the Founding Fathers, that the "unalienable rights" to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" guarantees us the right to pursue our greatest happiness--the elevation of ourselves to the pinnacle of our being; our true selves and our fullest potential.  It would be, in a sense, to evolve.

Thursday, March 3, 2016

Humanism: What a Piece of Work is a Man!




I go by Renaissance Man on here in part because I believe in the principles of humanism, which first became popular during the Italian Renaissance, which proceeded to sweep throughout Europe and changed the entire way we conceive of ourselves and our place in the world.  I believe in the idea that human beings have inherent value, which doesn’t require God or the church to validate via some special code of action dictated from on high.  People have value because of what we are. 

“'What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason, how infinite in faculty! In form and moving how express and admirable! In action how like an Angel! In apprehension how like a god!”

This famous line from Shakespeare’s Hamlet sums up the humanist understanding of humanity.  Comparing us to angels and gods highlights the limitless capacity of human potential.   The ideal of the Renaissance Man was one who pushed themselves to be all that they could.  They explored every aspect of their abilities, refusing to limit themselves to one job, or one narrow focus for their life, and to become complete, whole, to strive for greatness.  In a sense, it was a push for personal evolution.  Not the evolution of species Darwin spoke of, taking place across millennia, but a microcosm; an individual transformation and elevation across a lifetime.  In a time of complacency, mediocrity, and a culture of lies, misinformation, and anti-intellectual tendencies, it is an outlook I believe to be sorely needed.

Hamlet’s speech is underscored with a certain irony that belies the lofty language and high praise he utters.  The Danish Prince speaks the ideal, but it is not what he sees.  Indeed, we all fall short, and one need only look around to know that most people are not “infinite in faculty.” But we could be.  Each one of us has it within us to be better than we are.  That is our essential nature.  I think it MUST define us as a people if we are going to survive.  I do not see this as a sappy inspirational message, of the sort commonly shared on facebook and pinterest, but instead a moral (I might go so far as to say logical) imperative, and a part of our social contract as human beings belonging to a society.  We affect others merely by existing, and we change the world each time we draw breath.  Society only functions if we agree to treat each other by ethical standards, and functions at its best as a whole when we are at our own personal best.
It is therefore our social duty to self-actualize, and to allow each other to do the same. 

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Sing Out for Bernie

Andrew Romano thinks music may be the key to Bernie's Political Revolution.

In his Yahoo News article "How indie rock could help Bernie Sanders win the Nevada Caucuses" Romano discusses his frequent use of music and allied musicians in getting his message across.  The rapper Killer Mike has been supporting Bernie Sanders for some time, and held a joint concert along with Vampire Weekend before the Iowa Caucus.  A concert this past Friday night, before the Nevada caucuses, included many California based Indie bands, whose songs were largely in line with Sanders' populist message.  And while Bernie did not win Nevada, he remains a strong force this primary season.  Music has been, and should continue to be, a powerful force in the Revolution.

In my previous entry The Art of a Revolution, I linked to Makana's "The Fire is Ours," his moving Bernie anthem.  Now, The Color Bars have released a new music video entitled "The End of the Corporate Age."  It is a smooth, catchy tune, warning the corporate establishment that the people will not tolerate the status quo.



That's not all: The Bernie Blog has kept up with the contributions of Revolutionaries, who often include poetry, and in one case, a set of new lyrics to the tune of "Do You Hear the People Sing?" from Les Miserables.

This kind of creative energy is exactly what the Political Revolution needs.  It is precisely why I am proposing "Sing Outs for Bernie."  Just what are sing outs?

Simply that: Singing.  These are events where people gather together and sing.  The songs need not be original creations; they need not be about Bernie Sanders; they don't even automatically have to include folk songs like "This Land" (a favorite of the senator's).  Everyone should be encouraged to sing, and to sing along.  This is about building a spirit of positive energy.  Uniting us through a mutual love of music.  Let's sing out for Bernie.  Let's sing out for the America we deserve.